Record Minimum Wage Hikes Across Japan Blunted by Long Delays

Asia Daily
10 Min Read

A historic rise meets a historic wait

Japan approved the largest rise in minimum wages since the current system began, lifting every prefecture above 1,000 yen per hour for the first time. Officials also touted a record increase in the national weighted average. Yet that milestone shares the stage with a new reality. More than half of Japan’s prefectures chose to delay when the new rates take effect, some by months, which trims the real gains workers will see on a calendar year basis.

In all, 27 of the 47 prefectures scheduled implementation for November or later. Six, including Akita, Gunma and Tokushima, set dates that fall in early 2026. The earliest change arrives in Tochigi on Oct. 1, while Akita will not activate its new rate until March 31, 2026. This is the first time since the system established in fiscal 2002 that such widespread delays have occurred, creating a gap of roughly half a year between the earliest and latest start dates.

On paper, the progress is striking. The national weighted average minimum wage rises to roughly 1,121 yen per hour, and Tokyo moves to 1,226 yen. Kochi, Miyazaki and Okinawa settle at the lowest posted rate, 1,023 yen. Many prefectures even announced nominal increases that go beyond national guidance. The timing, however, determines what those increases mean in pay packets month by month.

How Japan sets the minimum wage

Japan sets its minimum wage through a two step process. A national advisory council groups prefectures into three economic categories, A to C, and issues a recommended increase for each rank. Local labour councils in each prefecture then decide their own rate, taking the guidance into account and voting on both the amount and the date it will take effect.

For fiscal 2025, the national recommendations called for increases of 63 yen in A and B prefectures and 64 yen in C prefectures. In recent years, new rates typically start in October. In fiscal 2024, every prefecture except Tokushima implemented in October. This year is different. Only about twenty will move in October, with the rest shifting their calendars into later months.

Several prefectural panels approved headline increases that top the national guidance. Kumamoto endorsed the largest nominal jump at 82 yen. In many places, though, local councils paired bigger figures with later start dates. That combination boosts the posted rate while cutting the actual average increase across the full year.

Delays change the math for workers

The effect of a later start is simple arithmetic. A region that raises its minimum wage by 80 yen but waits six months to apply it delivers an average of 40 yen more over the year in question. That shortfall becomes visible when economists convert each prefecture’s new rate into an annualized hourly figure that reflects the months at the old rate and the months at the new one.

Using that approach, labor economist Yukiko Abe of Hokkaido University calculated that Akita ends up with the lowest annualized minimum wage, 991 yen from Oct. 1, 2025. Kochi and Okinawa follow at 1,011 yen, with Kumamoto and Fukushima at 1,013 yen. In a tally of increases measured over the year rather than only at the final posted rate, 25 prefectures fall short of the national guidance by more than 1 yen.

Professor Abe found that Akita’s 80 yen decision, when offset by its long delay, equates to just 40 yen over the year, which is 24 yen below the reference level for its category.

Introducing her findings, Abe said the gap between posted rates and what workers receive month to month can be large when implementation slides.

“While the amounts appear to have increased substantially, when annualized, they do not meet the national guidelines.”

Other prefectures with deeper gaps include Gunma, Tokushima and Yamanashi. In several cases, the annualized increase undershoots the guideline by double digit yen amounts. The pattern shows how calendar decisions can reshape the impact of record level hikes.

Why local councils slowed the rollout

Japanese law sets the floor but leaves the calendar open. The Minimum Wage Act does not specify an effective date, and the latest national report encouraged local councils to deliberate thoroughly on when to start new rates. That language created room to weigh business conditions along with headline targets, which many local panels seized.

Small and midsize employers account for most jobs in Japan, employing roughly seven out of ten workers. Their profit margins are often thinner than those of large firms. With consumer prices still elevated, steep increases in the wage floor can be hard for smaller businesses to absorb at once. The government has also pressed for wage driven growth, and major firms have delivered average pay agreements of about 5.25 percent this year. Those sector wide gains set an ambitious backdrop for minimum wage decisions but do not eliminate the strain felt by small shops, care providers and regional manufacturers.

The administration has said it wants the national average minimum to reach 1,500 yen per hour by the end of the decade. Faster progress at the national level, though, can collide with local realities. The result this year is a compromise that shows up not in the posted amounts but in the implementation calendars.

Inside the prefecture by prefecture picture

The map of deadlines is diverse. Tochigi is the earliest mover, implementing on Oct. 1. Many prefectures follow in November and December. A handful will flip the switch in the new year. Six, including Akita, Gunma and Tokushima, go much later, with Akita reaching the finish line on March 31, 2026. It is the first time since 1978 that any prefecture has waited until the very end of a fiscal year to enact a new minimum wage.

Put alongside those calendars, the list of nominal levels tells a second story. Tokyo sits at 1,226 yen. The national weighted average rises by roughly 66 yen to about 1,121 yen. The lowest posted rates are 1,023 yen in Kochi, Miyazaki and Okinawa. Kumamoto, which passed the biggest headline increase at 82 yen, still sees the annualized benefit diluted if the new rate starts late.

Local councils ask Tokyo for clearer rules

The uneven rollout has sparked debate over who should set the calendar. Several prefectural councils have urged the central authorities to provide direction on timing, arguing that the question goes beyond local discretion.

In Wakayama, the local council pressed for a national stance. Members said a country wide rule would help deliver a coherent timeline across regions.

“This is not an issue for individual local decisions; we would like the central council to present a consistent policy.”

Officials in Okinawa also called for action at the center, urging a review of the framework behind implementation dates and hinting at the need for clarity in law.

“Instead of leaving discussions to local councils, a reexamination, including potential necessary legal revisions, should be conducted immediately.”

Those statements reflect growing concern that record level guidance loses much of its force when start dates drift. A single national window, or at least tighter guidelines on timing, would reduce the gap between the posted rate and the pay workers actually receive over a given year.

What it means for workers and employers right now

For workers paid at the minimum, the date on the calendar determines when their paychecks rise. A November start produces two months at the new rate within the calendar year and ten months at the old one. A January start pushes the change into the next tax year for most households. A date in late March 2026 means the old rate applies for much of the period covered by annualized calculations. With consumer prices still elevated, every month of delay reduces the extra cash in hand.

Roughly 6.6 million workers in Japan earn the minimum wage. Many of them are part time employees in retail, care services and hospitality. For these workers, even a 10 or 20 yen difference in hourly pay makes a visible change across a month of shifts. Delays that halve the effect of a posted increase, like Akita’s 80 yen decision that delivers about 40 yen on a year basis, can be the difference between keeping pace with bills and falling behind.

Employers, especially small businesses outside the largest cities, face their own arithmetic. Raising prices, investing in productivity, trimming hours and adjusting staffing levels are all on the table when wage floors rise. A delayed start offers breathing room to prepare budgets, update contracts and negotiate with clients. The tradeoff is that households see income gains more slowly, while the national push for higher pay risks losing momentum.

What to watch next

Attention now turns to two linked decisions. The central council will set the next round of guidance later in the fiscal year, and the government must decide whether to encourage a common implementation window. Some local panels have already asked for a consistent national policy or for legal revisions that define permissible timelines. Lawmakers and ministers also remain focused on a multi year goal to lift the national average minimum to 1,500 yen per hour by the end of the decade.

Financial authorities are watching wage trends closely. Broader pay agreements, minimum wage levels and inflation will shape the outlook for interest rates and household spending. A clear, predictable calendar for the minimum wage would also help businesses plan and would make it easier for workers to understand when raises will appear in their pay slips.

Key Points

  • Every prefecture moves above 1,000 yen per hour for the first time after record increases.
  • Twenty seven prefectures delay implementation to November or later, and six shift into 2026.
  • Earliest start is Oct. 1 in Tochigi, while Akita begins on March 31, 2026.
  • The national weighted average rises to roughly 1,121 yen; Tokyo reaches 1,226 yen.
  • Lowest posted rate is 1,023 yen in Kochi, Miyazaki and Okinawa.
  • Annualized calculations show Akita at 991 yen, with Kochi and Okinawa at 1,011 yen.
  • By annualized comparison, 25 prefectures fall below their national guideline increases.
  • National guidance for fiscal 2025 is 63 yen for A and B ranks and 64 yen for C.
  • The Minimum Wage Act sets no effective date, and this year’s national report encouraged local deliberation on timing.
  • Wakayama and Okinawa councils publicly urged clearer national direction, including possible legal changes.
  • Small and midsize firms employ about 70 percent of workers, making the pace of implementation a critical factor for business planning.
Share This Article