Nara's Deer Become a National Political Symbol
Nearly 3.95 million foreign residents live in Japan, just over 3% of its population, while the number of Japanese citizens fell by more than 900,000 in 2025, the largest annual decline on record. Yet the political debate over foreigners has increasingly focused on cultural conflict, misconduct and restrictions. As of January 16, 2026, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's government faces a tension between that approach and the country's growing need for workers from abroad.
Contents
- Nara's Deer Become a National Political Symbol
- How Immigration Moved to the Center of Politics
- A Shrinking Country Needs More Workers
- Tourism Crowds Feed Local Resentment
- What Welfare and Crime Figures Show
- Housing Purchases Tell a More Specific Story
- Foreign Patients Account for a Small Share of Unpaid Bills
- Paid Online Content Adds to the Anger
- Governors Push for Residents to Be Included
- Canada Offers a Comparison, With Different Foundations
- The Human Cost and the Choices Facing Japan
- Key Points
Takaichi, a native of Nara, brought that conflict into her campaign to lead the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Nara, Japan's ancient capital, is known for historic temples and sacred deer believed to be divine messengers. Reports of foreign visitors kicking those animals became a campaign symbol of disrespect toward Japanese traditions.
Takaichi, then seeking the LDP leadership, expressed her reaction in a question:
Don't you think something has gone too far?
The alleged mistreatment became part of a wider argument for restrictions on foreign residents and visitors. By connecting animal welfare with national identity, Takaichi gave party members worried about losing conservative voters a concrete image around which to rally.
Japan's debate now brings together several different pressures: misconduct by some tourists, crowded destinations, concerns about public services, and the challenge of integrating people who live and work in the country. Those pressures reach foreign workers and established residents as well as visitors. Many arrived seeking employment or cultural exchange, yet face public frustration linked to economic stagnation, rising living costs and rapid changes in tourism.
How Immigration Moved to the Center of Politics
The LDP's defeat in the upper house election on July 20, 2025, helped make foreign residents an unusually prominent issue in its leadership contest. The setback was largely attributed to the rise of the populist Sanseito party, whose "Japan First" message opposed what it called "excessive acceptance of foreigners."
Sanseito showed that cultural protectionism and suspicion of outsiders could draw conservative voters away from the LDP. Party strategists saw a threat to their traditional base, and the presidential race became an effort to recover those voters.
Shinjiro Koizumi, often regarded as a reformist, also moved toward tougher language during the campaign. As an LDP leadership contender, he promised to address alleged abuse of public benefits by foreigners:
correct improper uses of medical insurance and child allowances
Takaichi won the LDP presidential election in October 2025 after making restrictions on foreign residents a central part of her campaign. Her readiness to connect foreigners with threats to cultural identity and social order helped distinguish her position. Her victory marked a shift toward exclusionary nationalism within the party, with consequences for Japan's dealings with people from abroad.
The main developments unfolded across several months:
- July 20, 2025: The LDP suffered an upper house election defeat amid the rise of Sanseito.
- July 2025: All 47 prefectural governors jointly issued the Aomori Declaration, calling for foreign residents to be treated as members of their communities.
- October 2025: Takaichi won the LDP presidential election after a contest in which immigration became a major issue.
- January 16, 2026: Takaichi's government, working with the Japan Innovation Party, faced competing demands for tighter controls and greater integration.
Surveys cited in the debate show 66% of Japanese respondents supporting Takaichi's tougher immigration policies and 59% opposing the acceptance of foreign workers. The survey dates and methods were not specified. Those figures sit alongside a practical dependence on foreign labor that continues to grow as Japan's population ages.
A Shrinking Country Needs More Workers
Japan's median age is approaching 50, and industries across the country face serious labor shortages. Workers from Southeast Asia, South Asia and elsewhere help keep factories operating, convenience stores staffed and essential services running.
Foreign residents have reached a record of nearly 3.95 million people. Their share of the population remains low compared with other developed countries, but it represents a substantial change for a country long regarded as one of the industrialized world's most homogeneous societies.
Japan's economy and welfare system already depend heavily on foreign residents. A shrinking population means fewer people available to work and contribute to services while an aging population increases demand for care. The decline of more than 900,000 Japanese citizens in 2025 makes the tension between labor needs and political resistance especially sharp.
Takaichi's government, working with the populist Japan Innovation Party, also known as Nippon Ishin no Kai, has signaled an emphasis on control and national identity. Ishin has proposed an upper limit on the proportion of foreign residents, arguing that increased immigration creates social tension.
A proposed population limit and the need to recruit workers pull policy in different directions. Employers need people who can fill vacancies, while residents who settle for years need language support, access to services and a dependable place in community life. Restrictions on admission address only part of that problem.
Tourism Crowds Feed Local Resentment
A record 37 million tourists visited Japan in 2024. The influx has placed pressure on popular destinations, with daily caps limiting people climbing Mount Fuji or strolling Kyoto's scenic streets, and new fees intended to discourage excessive visitation.
Donny Kimball, a travel content creator and longtime resident, described changes in Shibuya, once closely associated with Japanese youth culture:
In years gone by, areas like Shibuya were havens of Japanese youth culture," he wrote. "These days, the streets of this former mecca of fashion, fun, and nightlife have become literal dumps thanks to the overtourism tax.
Kimball also described the fading character of Akihabara, known worldwide for anime and manga, as people who built that culture leave amid the influx of foreign visitors. His account connects frustration with tourism to a sense that familiar neighborhoods are losing their identity.
In Asakusa, Kimball recounted a Japanese salaryman shouting racial slurs at him outside a convenience store. He interpreted the encounter as an expression of accumulated anger toward tourist behavior:
This poor soul likely deals with foreign tourists behaving like absolute animals as they prance about, treating Asakusa as if it's some sort of cultural Disneyland made just for them," he observed. "Surely the endless examples of foreigners trashing Asakusa would be enough to sour even the most welcoming of individuals, fast-tracking them toward racism and xenophobia.
Kyoto has removed trash bins in some areas because visitors struggle with waste sorting, with garbage then left in inappropriate places. On Shikoku, accounts describe temples along the Ohenro pilgrimage becoming colder toward visitors who are not Japanese.
Tourist crowding and the lives of foreign residents intersect in public attitudes, even though they involve different needs. A visitor navigating waste rules and a worker paying insurance premiums may both encounter hostility directed at foreigners as a single group. That helps explain how anger about busy tourist districts can reach people who have lived in Japan for years.
What Welfare and Crime Figures Show
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare statistics put foreigners at 3.2% of welfare recipients as of April 2024, close to their 3.1% share of the population at that time. Those figures challenge the claim that foreigners use welfare disproportionately. The difference between the two shares is 0.1 percentage point.
An Asia Times investigation described surveys and government figures that challenge several common narratives about foreign residents. Alongside welfare, it examined crime, property purchases and medical costs, areas that have become central to political arguments for stricter controls.
Government data show that the number of foreigners arrested for Penal Code violations has fallen to one third of its level less than two decades earlier. Arrests under the Penal Code concern suspected violations of Japan's criminal law. The direction of that change contrasts with the belief that a growing foreign population has made crime worse.
Welfare recipients, criminal suspects, tourists and workers appear in different datasets because each measure answers a different question. Looking at the actual numbers makes the debate more concrete: the welfare share is close to the population share, while the recorded number of arrests has declined over the period described.
Housing Purchases Tell a More Specific Story
A Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism survey found that condominium purchases by overseas residents in Tokyo's 23 wards doubled in the first half of 2025. Concerns about rising prices have often focused on speculation by buyers from mainland China, but the survey's buyer breakdown was more varied.
The figures listed 192 buyers from Taiwan, 30 from mainland China, 21 from Singapore and 15 from Hong Kong. Among those four groups, the number from Taiwan was 6.4 times the number from mainland China, using the reported figures of 192 and 30.
Only about 1% of condominium resales over a short period involved overseas residents. Rapid turnover was therefore largely driven by domestic buyers. Reselling a property quickly is one way housing can be traded for a short term gain, so the identity of those buyers matters when discussing speculation.
Tokyo's housing debate involves both the growth in overseas purchases and the much larger domestic role in quick resales. The figures describe overseas residents, while much of the political discussion concerns foreigners more broadly. Keeping the actual purchasing categories visible gives readers a more precise picture of who is active in the market.
Foreign Patients Account for a Small Share of Unpaid Bills
Among 2,890 hospitals accepting foreign patients, 470 reported unpaid bills from foreigners. That is about 16.3% of the hospitals in that group, calculated from the two reported figures. The money owed, however, was a much smaller share of the national total.
Foreign patients accounted for 1.5% of the 88.1 billion yen in unpaid bills across all hospitals in fiscal 2023. The remaining 98.5% was owed by Japanese nationals. Expressed in money, those shares amount to approximately 1.32 billion yen and 86.78 billion yen respectively, using the reported total.
National health insurance figures offer another comparison. Foreigners made up 4% of enrollees but accounted for 1.4% of medical costs. Their share of spending was therefore 35% of their share of enrollment, calculated by dividing 1.4 by 4.
An unnamed commentator on Asahi TV explained the relationship between foreign enrollment, medical use and insurance payments:
Foreigners tend to use medical services less, and their insurance premiums help support the system for Japanese patients as well,
Insurance premiums are payments into a shared fund that pays for treatment. When members contribute while using relatively little care, their payments help cover treatment for other members. The enrollment and spending figures show why foreign residents are also contributors to Japan's health system.
Paid Online Content Adds to the Anger
Anti-foreigner narratives also circulate through online content created for payment. The Asia Times investigation identified a posting on CrowdWorks, a major online platform matching clients with workers, seeking creators for videos labeled "China-critical" or "anti-China."
The application requirements said applicants must "love Japan and dislike China." Records showed 31 people contracted across 14 postings, with payments of 1,500 to 5,000 yen per script.
The work included writing scripts for YouTube videos and editing with images generated by artificial intelligence. Listed subjects included "overseas reactions to Japanese technology" and "Chinese people's nuisance or rule-breaking behavior, followed by self-inflicted consequences or divine punishment."
Artificial intelligence can produce images from instructions, allowing creators to assemble visual scenes without photographing an actual event. Paid scripts and generated imagery can package a grievance into persuasive entertainment that viewers encounter alongside accounts of genuine tourist misconduct.
Real problems involving some visitors and manufactured outrage can reinforce each other. The resulting anxiety reaches respectful tourists and established residents who follow Japanese norms. False narratives about foreign residents have political value because a cultural threat can be used to mobilize voters, even when government figures present a different picture of welfare use, crime or medical spending.
Governors Push for Residents to Be Included
Hamamatsu and Kawasaki, cities with large foreign populations, have developed language education, welfare access and community initiatives. Their work reflects local governments' daily responsibilities toward people who need schools, services and a place in neighborhood life.
All 47 prefectural governors jointly issued the Aomori Declaration in July 2025. They argued that foreigners should be recognized as residents living alongside Japanese citizens, rather than being valued only as workers.
The governors called for a Basic Law on Intercultural Coexistence, stable budgets for integration and a working group across ministries. Such a law would provide a national foundation for helping people from different cultural backgrounds live together, while stable funding would allow local programs to continue beyond individual projects.
The LDP committee on "orderly coexistence" confined its work to reviewing admission frameworks and avoided planning for the longer term. Admission rules determine who may enter and under what conditions. Integration deals with what happens afterward: learning Japanese, developing skills, protecting rights, accessing services and participating in civic life.
Former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba used the phrase "orderly and harmonious coexistence" in discussing foreigners. In Japanese policy discourse, that wording suggests foreigners living under the norms of the Japanese majority rather than participating as equals in shaping society. For foreign residents, the result can be continued insecurity about their lasting place in the country.
Takaichi's focus on policing and restrictions widens the distance between national political priorities and local efforts to manage multicultural communities. The governors' proposals address the practical task of living together, while the national debate has concentrated more heavily on entry conditions and compliance.
Canada Offers a Comparison, With Different Foundations
Nearly 60% of Canadians surveyed in late 2024 said their country was accepting too many newcomers. It was the first time since 2000 that most respondents considered immigration levels too high. Housing, infrastructure and health services have contributed to growing skepticism in a country long recognized for its immigration policies.
Canada has adjusted admission targets and tightened some programs while retaining a framework for integration over the longer term. Japan has taken a different approach for decades, expanding technical worker programs and promoting inbound tourism while insisting that these measures did not amount to "immigration."
That approach helped accommodate conservative opinion but left Japan without the comprehensive legal and institutional framework needed for lasting integration. Recruiting labor and attracting visitors expanded contact with the outside world faster than the policy framework for people who build their lives in Japan.
The comparison shows that public resistance can emerge even where immigration has a long institutional history. Japan faces that resistance while also needing to decide how workers admitted through employment programs can become secure community members.
The Human Cost and the Choices Facing Japan
A prospective visitor expressed anxiety on Facebook about whether growing hostility would extend to tourists who behave respectfully:
I heard about anti-foreign sentiment growing over there," one potential visitor wrote on Facebook. "What I'm asking is, does the anti-foreign sentiment apply to the polite and respectful tourists? Will I be made to feel unwelcome, and hated, just because I'm a tourist?
Some responses maintained that Japanese people remain kind and helpful when visitors respect local customs. Longtime foreign residents, however, describe overhearing more negative comments and feeling less welcome despite years of adapting to Japanese life.
The Tokyo Review framed the relationship Japan needs with people from abroad in terms of partnership:
Japan needs more than just guests—it needs partners," the Tokyo Review observed. "How the new government decides to move forward will determine whether this moment becomes a possibility for transformation or a lost opportunity in the long run.
Tighter screening, stricter enforcement of visa conditions and narrower routes to settlement point toward a future centered on conditional status. A strategy aimed at lasting integration would pair admission rules with equal rights, inclusive institutions, language and cultural support, and regional programs suited to local needs.
Japan's coalition emphasis on national pride and identity risks deepening social divisions while leaving population decline unresolved. Without a serious immigration policy, industries face staffing difficulties, welfare systems face pressure and communities face greater strain. If fewer foreign workers choose to stay, weaker investment in integration and a public narrative of foreigners as burdens could reinforce that decline.
A weak yen attracts visitors while making life harder for ordinary Japanese citizens, adding to resentment about tourism and living costs. The original criticism also connected that currency effect with visitors regarded as poorly behaved. Individual tourists and workers nevertheless carry much of the public anger over economic and demographic problems that extend far beyond their conduct.
Japan's immediate choice concerns how it treats people already contributing to its economy and those it needs to recruit. Rules addressing misconduct and admission sit alongside the need for secure settlement, functioning services and community participation. The balance between control and inclusion will shape whether foreign residents can help sustain economic life as the population continues to shrink.
Key Points
- Takaichi used reports of visitors kicking Nara's sacred deer to connect foreign behavior with cultural protection during her leadership campaign.
- The LDP's July 20, 2025, election defeat and Sanseito's rise helped move immigration to the center of the October leadership contest.
- Japan has nearly 3.95 million foreign residents, just over 3% of its population, while its citizen population fell by more than 900,000 in 2025.
- A record 37 million tourists visited in 2024, placing pressure on destinations including Kyoto, Shibuya, Asakusa and Mount Fuji.
- Foreigners accounted for 3.2% of welfare recipients in April 2024, close to their 3.1% population share.
- Foreign patients accounted for 1.5% of unpaid hospital bills in fiscal 2023; foreign health insurance members represented 4% of enrollment and 1.4% of medical costs.
- Paid online scripts and images generated by artificial intelligence have been used for content hostile to China.
- All 47 prefectural governors called for stronger integration policies through the July 2025 Aomori Declaration.
- Surveys cited support of 66% for tougher immigration policies and opposition of 59% to accepting foreign workers.
- The Japan Innovation Party has proposed limiting the proportion of foreign residents, while employers and local governments face growing needs for workers and integration.






