Thousands fall ill as a nutrition drive expands
Indonesia's food and drug agency recorded 103 incidents affecting 9,089 children between January and September 2025 in the country's Free Nutritious Meals program. By late October, civil society monitors were reporting totals above 15,000. A policy introduced by President Prabowo Subianto to fight hunger and malnutrition is now facing anger over the safety of the food it serves.
Contents
- Thousands fall ill as a nutrition drive expands
- A promise to feed up to 83 million people
- How the outbreaks accumulated
- Where food safety broke down
- Too many meals and too few certified kitchens
- A rapid rollout meets gaps in oversight
- Prabowo defends the program as officials tighten rules
- A large budget brings demands for transparency
- Families weigh financial relief against fear
- What safer preparation and delivery would require
- Keeping nutrition at the center of the meal
- Key Points
In Cipongkor District, West Java, more than 1,300 children became sick in late September. Among the families caught in the wider West Java outbreaks was Rini Irawati, who rushed into a crowded emergency center to find her daughter Nabila pale and struggling to breathe. The teenager, aged 16, had eaten a free school lunch hours earlier and was one of hundreds of students in her area who became violently ill that day.
Students have reported stomach pain, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness and shortness of breath. Some outbreaks were declared extraordinary events to speed up the response. Parents have organized protests and posted photographs of spoiled food, while officials have suspended kitchens, retrained workers and promised tighter standards.
Prabowo has defended the program by pointing to its enormous reach and the small share of meals associated with illness. Public health critics focus on the recurring failures behind the outbreaks: poor storage, dirty equipment, delayed deliveries and kitchens serving more children than staff can adequately supervise.
As of November 10, the government faces two connected tasks: maintaining meals that many families depend on and making every stage of preparation and delivery safe enough to regain parents' trust.
A promise to feed up to 83 million people
Prabowo introduced the Free Nutritious Meals initiative in January. Known in Indonesian as Makan Bergizi Gratis, or MBG, it provides daily meals to schoolchildren and also covers toddlers, pregnant women and new mothers. Its stated purpose is to tackle empty stomachs, improve attendance and help children learn.
The National Nutrition Agency says meals have already reached many students, with a goal of serving up to 83 million people by the end of 2025. Agencies plan to expand the network to roughly 32,000 kitchens by next year. The budget runs into tens of billions of dollars over the next two years.
Indonesia's geography makes that ambition especially demanding. The country has about 17,000 islands and tens of thousands of schools. A network of centralized kitchens must buy ingredients, prepare large quantities of food and deliver meals across areas with very different transport and storage conditions.
Stunting is a central reason for the policy. About one in five Indonesian children under five years old is affected by the condition, which is linked to chronic malnutrition. Children experiencing stunting have impaired growth and can face limits to cognitive development. Reliable nutrition is therefore intended to support both physical development and learning.
Supporters also see benefits for adults. Catering and agriculture could gain jobs, while free meals can ease pressure on families dealing with rising food prices. Those potential gains have been overshadowed by the repeated illnesses and the need to establish dependable safety checks.
How the outbreaks accumulated
Thousands of children have fallen ill since the rollout, with large clusters in West Java, Central Java, Yogyakarta and parts of Sumatra and Sulawesi. The food and drug agency told parliament that incidents increased from late July, when many new kitchens began operating.
The National Nutrition Agency confirmed 6,517 students affected by the end of September; the food and drug agency's January to September tally was 9,089 children across 103 incidents. Nongovernmental groups documented totals exceeding 10,000 and rising above 15,000 by late October. Multiple agencies and local governments have been compiling data, often after large clusters occur, while investigations continue.
The rollout and the growing safety concerns followed this sequence:
- January 2025: Prabowo introduced the Free Nutritious Meals program.
- Late July: The food and drug agency recorded a rise in incidents as many new kitchens began operating.
- Late September: More than 1,300 children became sick in Cipongkor District, West Java.
- End of September: The National Nutrition Agency confirmed 6,517 affected students. The food and drug agency counted 9,089 children in 103 incidents from January through September.
- Late October: Civil society monitors reported totals above 15,000.
Laboratory tests in confirmed cases found bacterial contamination, including salmonella and bacillus cereus. These organisms can multiply when cooked food remains too long at unsafe temperatures, making the time between preparation and eating a central concern.
Where food safety broke down
Investigations have repeatedly identified basic handling errors. Some meals were distributed four hours or more after cooking. Ingredients were bought too far in advance or stored in conditions that allowed bacteria to multiply. Trays and utensils were washed in dirty water, some kitchens lacked refrigeration, and expired sauce was used.
A kitchen preparing thousands of portions faces risks at several stages. Ingredients must remain safe before cooking, workers must avoid contaminating food during preparation, and cooked dishes must be kept at suitable temperatures until children eat them. A failure at any stage can affect a large number of meals.
Indonesia's traffic, geography and limited cold chain in some districts add to the difficulty. A cold chain is the sequence of refrigerated storage and transport that keeps perishable ingredients cold. Without it, kitchens have less room for delays, especially when meals travel through midday heat to multiple schools.
Taruna Ikrar, head of the food and drug agency, told lawmakers that many kitchens involved in outbreaks were new and struggled with basic food safety. He described the problems investigators had found:
We found meals distributed four hours after cooking, improper storage of ingredients, and a lack of knowledge of food security among kitchen workers.
Some menus also included fried shark, an inappropriate item for a program preparing food in large quantities because of concerns about storage and possible mercury exposure. The incidents point to a need for controls on menu choices as well as cleanliness, equipment and delivery times.
Too many meals and too few certified kitchens
In parts of West Java, a single kitchen has been tasked with serving thousands of students. That workload makes checks during preparation and before delivery difficult, particularly when staff must oversee ingredients, cooking, portioning and transport at the same time.
Diah Saminarsih, a public health leader and founder of the Centre for Indonesia's Strategic Development Initiatives, warned that the design placed too much pressure on kitchens and their staff:
In West Java one kitchen may cater to 3,500 students, making it impossible for a nutritionist to control quality.
Certification has also lagged behind expansion. Lawmaker Edy Wuryanto told parliament that only a small fraction of kitchens had obtained formal hygiene and sanitation certification:
Only 36 of 8,000 kitchens had earned hygiene and sanitation certification. That must change quickly.
Those figures amount to 0.45 percent of the 8,000 kitchens he cited. Certification is intended to provide a formal check that a facility meets hygiene and sanitation standards before large numbers of people depend on its food.
Legislators have urged the government to reduce the number of students served by each kitchen, speed up certification and inspect facilities more frequently. Smaller workloads and shorter routes would make it easier to supervise preparation and deliver meals promptly.
A rapid rollout meets gaps in oversight
Public health critics argue that expansion moved faster than the systems needed to manage it. Clear rules for preparation and distribution, oversight shared across ministries and uniform certification were missing or applied unevenly.
Reporting has often followed outbreaks rather than providing current information that could help officials identify problems early. Limited real time data on kitchen conditions and health outcomes have made rapid corrections harder.
Made Supriatma, a political researcher who has tracked implementation, said the political timetable appeared to take priority over readiness:
The policy was meant as a quick win in the first 100 days, but it has backfired and produced a wave of public anger.
Security forces and affiliated groups have been involved in kitchen or logistics operations in some districts. Critics say this blurs responsibility and brings people without technical public health roles into work where clear accountability is essential.
For a school receiving a delivery, accountability means knowing who is responsible for the ingredients, the kitchen, the journey and the response to a suspected illness. The concerns raised about oversight extend across that entire chain.
Prabowo defends the program as officials tighten rules
Prabowo has said the illnesses represent a tiny fraction of the more than a billion meals served. He has also credited the program with better attendance and learning outcomes among many students:
Of more than a billion meals served, cases represent about 0.0017 percent, and the program is improving attendance and achievement.
Health critics argue that the scale of delivery offers little comfort to parents whose children need intravenous treatment. Their concern is that preventable errors are recurring across kitchens, suppliers and transport routes.
The National Nutrition Agency says it is strengthening training and operations to prevent further incidents and rebuild trust. Kitchens linked to outbreaks have been suspended, workers have been retrained, and some facilities have reopened after meeting standards.
Dadan Hindayana, head of the agency, said stricter hygiene and smaller operations were intended to remove avoidable risks:
Our objective is zero incidents. We will enforce stricter hygiene and move to smaller kitchen operations that we can monitor closely.
The agency plans to continue expanding the network while making individual kitchens smaller and easier to supervise. It has drafted stricter regulations on hygiene and food handling. Authorities say new guidelines will cover how far in advance ingredients can be bought, delivery times and temperature checks for every batch leaving a kitchen. No date was given for putting all of those safeguards into operation.
A large budget brings demands for transparency
Civil society monitors have raised concerns about who operates kitchens, who supplies ingredients and who audits performance. They describe the program's budget as one of the largest for a single social initiative in recent years, while pointing to gaps in the rules governing contracts and oversight.
Activists warn that weak procurement supervision and the involvement of organizations with political or security ties can damage food quality and public trust. Procurement is the process of choosing suppliers and purchasing goods or services. In this program, it affects the ingredients kitchens receive and the organizations paid to prepare and deliver meals.
Egi Primayogha of Indonesia Corruption Watch said the legal and governance arrangements had failed to keep pace with the program's ambition:
This program has one of the biggest budgets in history, yet there is not one single regulation ensuring transparent and accountable management.
The transparency concerns sit alongside the safety failures. Families need confidence that contracts are supervised and that problems lead to corrective action. Civil society monitors are pressing for clearer responsibility and closer scrutiny of spending and performance.
Families weigh financial relief against fear
Many schools say children who previously skipped lunch now receive a hot meal. For families facing rising prices and unpredictable incomes, that support can make a practical difference each day.
A principal in South Jakarta described how the meals were helping households struggling with food costs:
The program has made a real difference for many families who are trying to keep up with food costs.
Rohmani, a breastfeeding mother whose children began receiving school meals, said the program had brought reassurance about feeding her family:
I feel reassured knowing I can provide adequate nutrition to my baby, and my other children also get meals at school.
Rini Irawati reached a different conclusion after Nabila's illness. She said she could no longer support the policy until safety was guaranteed and explained why her daughter's experience had changed her view:
We are talking about children's lives. I do not want other parents and their children to go through anything like this.
Parents are now divided between appreciation for help with food costs and calls for a pause until meals are safe. The government's challenge is to preserve the support families value while addressing the failures that have made others afraid to let their children eat.
What safer preparation and delivery would require
Food safety depends on every link between buying ingredients and serving lunch. The recurring problems involve timing, temperature, sanitation and transport, all areas where established practices can reduce risk when kitchens have suitable equipment, trained staff and consistent checks.
A practical package of reforms would address the failures identified in the outbreaks:
- Certify every kitchen before it serves meals, then require periodic recertification and surprise inspections.
- Limit the number of students per kitchen and shorten delivery routes so meals arrive within two hours of cooking.
- Use food grade containers and insulated carriers. Keep hot food above 60 degrees Celsius or cold food below 5 degrees Celsius.
- Exclude dishes requiring complex handling and perishable sauces with short safe serving windows.
- Train all workers in hand washing, preventing contamination between foods, and cleaning with safe water and detergents.
- Set strict purchasing windows for fresh ingredients. Store protein and dairy products in working refrigerators and keep temperature logs.
- Use a hazard control plan in every kitchen, with checklists for cooking temperatures and holding times for each menu.
- Create a centralized dashboard recording kitchen conditions, delivery times and illnesses, accessible to local health offices and schools.
- Give school committees and parent groups a role in monitoring deliveries, tasting meals on arrival and reporting concerns quickly through a hotline.
- Publish incident reports and corrective actions so communities can see what failed and how it was addressed.
A hazard control plan identifies the steps where food could become unsafe and sets checks to manage those risks. Temperature logs and delivery records turn those checks into information that supervisors can review, rather than leaving safety to assumptions.
Keeping nutrition at the center of the meal
Countries with long experience in school feeding often combine certified centralized kitchens in urban areas with cooking organized within communities for smaller schools. Strong local oversight, temperature checks for each batch and parental monitoring are common parts of those arrangements.
Indonesia can adapt those approaches to its geography. Remote districts can use more decentralized preparation, while groups of schools near certified urban kitchens can share a delivery network where transport allows. Buying from local agriculture can provide fresher ingredients and shorter supply routes while benefiting surrounding communities.
A typical school lunch should include protein such as eggs, chicken, fish, tofu or tempeh, together with vegetables, fruit and a staple such as rice. Foods rich in iron help prevent anemia, which is common among adolescents. Safe oils and limited sugar help reduce health problems over time.
Programs should avoid ultraprocessed products that provide many calories but few nutrients, as well as fish species carrying mercury risks for children. Those menu choices serve the same purpose as the wider initiative: helping children receive dependable nourishment.
Nutrition and food safety belong together. A balanced meal can meet its purpose only when ingredients are stored properly, preparation is hygienic and the food remains safe through delivery and serving. Restoring confidence will depend on making those requirements routine in every kitchen.
Key Points
- The food and drug agency counted 103 incidents affecting 9,089 children from January through September 2025.
- The National Nutrition Agency confirmed 6,517 affected students by the end of September; civil monitors reported totals above 15,000 by late October.
- More than 1,300 children became sick in Cipongkor District, West Java, in late September.
- Investigations found delayed distribution, poor storage, dirty washing water, missing refrigeration and other hygiene failures.
- The program aims to reach up to 83 million people by the end of 2025 and roughly 32,000 kitchens by next year.
- A lawmaker said only 36 of 8,000 kitchens had hygiene and sanitation certification.
- Prabowo defended the program's reach and benefits; the nutrition agency promised stricter hygiene, smaller kitchens and zero incidents.
- Families value relief from food costs, while affected parents demand safety and civil groups seek stronger oversight and transparency.
- Proposed safeguards include certification, shorter delivery times, temperature controls, trained workers and public incident reporting.






