Philippines Targets November Trade Deals as China Tensions Expose Import Reliance

11 Min Read
Philippines Targets November Trade Deals as China Tensions Expose Import Reliance

Manila seeks new markets while keeping China trade open

The Philippines is targeting November to finish trade negotiations with the European Union and Canada and revise its economic partnership with Japan, while seeking to sign an agreement with Chile in October or November. The push comes as a diplomatic dispute with Beijing puts a trading relationship worth tens of billions of dollars under closer scrutiny.

Contents
  1. Manila seeks new markets while keeping China trade open
  2. Why Chinese supplies matter to Philippine factories
  3. What the European agreement could open
  4. Canada and Japan offer different opportunities
  5. Chile moves from negotiations toward signature
  6. The diplomatic dispute behind the trade concerns
  7. Exporters weigh China against an unpredictable US market
  8. Diversification reaches beyond new trade agreements
  9. The dates and decisions to watch
  10. Key Points

China supplied more than $38.22 billion in Philippine imports in 2025, accounting for 28.6 percent of the country's total purchases from abroad. It also bought $9.3 billion in Philippine products, making it the fourth largest export destination. For Manila, the exposure runs in both directions: businesses need Chinese customers, but many also need Chinese materials to make goods for other markets.

Trade Secretary Cristina Roque said the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) had no contingency plan for possible economic fallout from the dispute. The department had received no reports of trade or investment concerns linked to the tensions, she said, and would concentrate on securing wider market access.

Roque described the agreements as a potential boost for exporters while speaking at the second ASEAN Chinese Business Leaders Summit, hosted by the Federation of Filipino Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

"These will be a game changer for the export industry," Roque said.

The immediate challenge is timing. Negotiating an agreement, signing it and bringing its tariff reductions into operation are different stages. Manila's November targets concern completing or advancing negotiations; companies will need the final terms and implementation schedules before they can calculate savings on specific products.

Advertisement

Why Chinese supplies matter to Philippine factories

Philippine Exporters Confederation president Sergio Ortiz-Luis Jr. has warned that disruption to Chinese imports could reach beyond shops selling finished goods. Manufacturers use imported components and raw materials to produce goods that are later exported, including to the United States.

Ortiz-Luis described the sourcing problem facing those businesses.

"It's not easy to replace the imports from China," he said.

August trade figures illustrate how closely imports and exports are connected. Electronic products generated $6.2 billion, or 68.1 percent, of Philippine export sales that month. Electronic imports reached $4.51 billion, or 34.8 percent of imports, while raw materials and intermediate goods accounted for $5.14 billion, or 39.7 percent. Intermediate goods are parts or materials used to make another product.

Those categories cover trade with all partners. China alone supplied $2.94 billion, or 22.7 percent, of August imports. A manufacturer facing difficulty obtaining a Chinese component could therefore struggle to fill an order from a customer elsewhere, even if demand for its finished product remained strong.

The annual figures also show the scale of the imbalance. Philippine Statistics Authority data were cited as showing a $29.13 billion trade deficit with China in 2025, while the stated import and export totals of $38.22 billion and $9.3 billion imply a gap of about $28.92 billion. A trade deficit means the country buys more goods from a partner than it sells to that partner.

What the European agreement could open

The EU agreement is the largest prospective market opening among the negotiations highlighted by Roque. The bloc has 27 member countries and about 450 million people. DTI's negotiating agreements page puts trade between the Philippines and the EU at approximately $18 billion in 2023.

Roque said the EU negotiations had been substantially concluded, with a few issues still outstanding, and set November as the target for completing them. The talks began in 2015, involved negotiation rounds and consultations from 2016 to 2021, and resumed in 2024.

DTI identifies electronics, agricultural products and seafood as potential beneficiaries of better access to Europe. Machinery, automobiles and chemicals are major Philippine imports from the bloc. The proposed agreement also seeks to encourage investment and reduce barriers beyond tariffs, the taxes charged on imported goods.

For a Philippine exporter, a lower tariff could reduce the cost of selling into Europe. Other provisions could affect the requirements a business must meet to enter that market. The exact gains will depend on the products covered, the rules agreed and when those rules take effect.

Advertisement

Canada and Japan offer different opportunities

Canada appears in Manila's trade agenda through more than one negotiating route. DTI lists an ASEAN Canada free trade agreement, whose negotiations began in 2021. Roque has also referred to a Philippines Canada agreement among the government's priorities.

The Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada describes the bilateral process in its trade policy explainer. Canada and the Philippines began exploring a possible agreement in December 2024 and held further preliminary discussions in June 2025. The regional negotiations involve ASEAN collectively, while the bilateral discussions concern the Philippines and Canada directly.

DTI estimates Canada Philippines trade at about $2 billion in 2023. Its market assessment identifies electronics, agricultural goods and seafood as Philippine export opportunities, alongside possible cooperation in technology and services. Canada's exports to the Philippines also include food supplies such as meat and wheat.

Japan presents a more specific near term objective: improving an existing agreement. Roque wants the first revision of the Philippines Japan Economic Partnership Agreement completed by November, with lower tariffs for Philippine bananas and other products among the expected benefits.

For banana growers and exporters, the relevant question is the final tariff treatment their shipments receive. Roque has described the revision as a way to reopen opportunities in Japan, rather than the creation of an entirely new trading relationship.

Chile moves from negotiations toward signature

Chile is further along in the process. DTI announced on July 24, 2026, that negotiations for the Philippines Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement had been completed. Roque's October or November target concerns signing the agreement, which would become the Philippines' first free trade pact with a Latin American country.

The completion came during the 80th anniversary year of diplomatic relations between the two countries. DTI's official chronology dates the launch of negotiations to December 2024, following an earlier study and consultation phase in 2015.

The agreement is intended to support Philippine exports of electronics, coconut products and personal care products. It would also improve access to Chilean salmon and copper ores and concentrates. Copper is useful to electronics manufacturing, renewable energy equipment and other industrial production, giving the pact a supply role as well as a sales role.

Chile ranked as the Philippines' 51st trading partner in 2025. Figures attributed to UN Comtrade put Philippine exports to Chile at $45.43 million and imports at $72.41 million, a combined $117.84 million. DTI's status page gives a much larger estimate of approximately $1 billion for 2023 trade; the two figures refer to different years, and no explanation for the gap was given.

The pact also includes chapters on the digital economy, innovation, the environment, labor, global value chains, and trade and gender. Its commercial reach therefore extends beyond cutting taxes on goods crossing borders.

Advertisement

The diplomatic dispute behind the trade concerns

Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan triggered criticism after discussing China's military capabilities at an event at Diliman College. His remarks prompted calls in the Senate for his replacement and consideration of a resolution declaring him persona non grata, a diplomatic term for someone considered unwelcome.

Jing said China could prevail in a confrontation but preferred peace.

If we want to use force, we may easily win," he said. "But no, we will not use force. You know, we love peace.

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. called the remarks threatening and sought clarification. Senators Ana Theresia Hontiveros, Francis Pangilinan and Joseph Victor Ejercito called for the envoy's replacement, while Senator Jinggoy Estrada cautioned that declaring him unwelcome could weaken dialogue.

Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian also urged careful examination of the proposed resolution's wording. He supported continued diplomacy over the West Philippine Sea, the Philippine name for waters west of the country that include areas contested with China.

The maritime dispute has a legal foundation as well as a diplomatic one. The 2016 South China Sea arbitral ruling found no legal basis under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for China's claimed historic rights to resources within its nine dash line. China has rejected the ruling.

Palace Press Officer Clarissa Castro said Marcos wanted bilateral discussions handled diplomatically while treating commercial relations and territorial protection as separate matters. She also said there was no prohibition on trade and investment with China. Roque said it was too early to assess the economic consequences of possible diplomatic action.

Exporters weigh China against an unpredictable US market

Ortiz-Luis has urged a broader reassessment of Manila's economic and geopolitical relationships. He described Beijing as a more reliable trading partner than Washington amid repeated changes to US President Donald Trump's tariff policies, and suggested reconsidering the Philippines' positioning after the next administration takes office in 2028.

The Philexport president argued that preserving Chinese commercial ties was essential.

"I think we cannot afford to really push China away," he said.

The 2025 export figures explain why businesses value several markets at once. The United States bought $13.44 billion in Philippine goods, Hong Kong bought $12.32 billion, mainland China bought $9.3 billion and Taiwan bought $3.28 billion.

Mainland China and Hong Kong together purchased $21.62 billion, about 61 percent more than the $13.44 billion sold to the United States. The US remained the largest individual destination. Grouping mainland China and Hong Kong shows the scale of combined commercial demand, while the individual totals show where shipments were recorded.

The Asia Pacific Foundation's account of 2024 trade describes the same basic pattern: the United States was the leading export market and China dominated imports. Its assessment also identifies weak logistics and regulatory inefficiencies as constraints on the Philippines' ability to attract manufacturers seeking alternative production locations.

Advertisement

Diversification reaches beyond new trade agreements

Gatchalian's proposal covers investment and tourism as well as exports. He named Southeast Asia, Japan, South Korea and Europe as markets to strengthen, arguing that relatively low trade and tourism activity with other ASEAN members leaves room for closer regional ties.

The Senate president said the Philippines needed a wider spread of economic relationships.

"Strategically, we need to diversify our markets," he said.

Existing export shares provide a starting point. The Asia Pacific Foundation puts ASEAN's share of Philippine exports at 15 percent in 2024, Japan's at 14.1 percent, the EU's at 11 percent and South Korea's at 4.9 percent. Together, those destinations accounted for 45 percent, showing that diversification can build on substantial existing business.

Investment experience also shapes the policy debate. In a January 2025 analysis, the Center for Strategic and International Studies examined 10 selected infrastructure projects backed by China. Four had been abandoned by China or shifted to another investor. The analysis describes Manila seeking Japanese, South Korean, US and European participation in infrastructure and industrial development.

The same analysis identifies reliable electricity and infrastructure as requirements for expanding technology manufacturing. New tariff preferences can help a Philippine factory compete abroad, while dependable power, transport and materials help it deliver the order.

Manila's negotiating program is already broader than the November priorities. DTI also lists a preferential trade agreement with India, which would grant improved access to selected products. Roque has cited work on the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement, while a pact signed with the United Arab Emirates in January became the Philippines' first free trade agreement with a Middle Eastern country.

The dates and decisions to watch

The trade agenda stretches across years of negotiations, with Chile now awaiting signature and several other processes approaching government targets. The main milestones are:

  • 2015: Philippines EU negotiations began, and initial study and consultation work on a Chile agreement took place.
  • 2021: ASEAN Canada trade negotiations began.
  • 2024: EU negotiations resumed; Philippines Chile negotiations launched in December.
  • June 2025: Canada and the Philippines held further preliminary bilateral trade discussions.
  • July 24, 2026: DTI announced completion of the Chile negotiations.
  • October or November 2026: Roque aims to sign the Chile agreement.
  • November 2026: DTI targets completion of EU and Canada negotiations and the first revision of the Japan economic partnership.

Philippine exporters enter this period after merchandise exports reached a record $84.48 billion in 2025. Exports in the first five months of 2026 rose 10 percent to $37.87 billion from $34.25 billion a year earlier.

Maintaining that growth requires buyers and supplies. The agreements seek additional customers and trading options, while diplomatic engagement aims to preserve an existing relationship that provides more than a quarter of Philippine imports. Businesses will be watching both tracks as the November targets approach.

Key Points

  • DTI targets November for EU and Canada negotiations and revisions to the Japan economic partnership.
  • Chile negotiations finished in July 2026, with signature targeted for October or November.
  • China supplied 28.6 percent of Philippine imports in 2025 and bought $9.3 billion in Philippine exports.
  • Exporters warn that difficulty replacing Chinese materials could disrupt manufacturing and overseas sales.
  • DTI says it has received no reports of trade or investment concerns linked to the diplomatic tensions.
  • Manila is pursuing wider markets while maintaining trade and diplomatic engagement with Beijing.
Share This Article

You May also Like